Topics

  • Abu-thumb-w-gray
  • Nick-Berg-thumb-w-gray
  • Dover-casket-thumb-w-gray
  • Fallujah-thumb-w-gray
  • saddamsons-thumb-w-gray
  • Bush-photoop-thumb-w-gray
  • Related-Issues

Search This Site


Special Projects


  • Photography & War Issue
Blog powered by TypePad

Sudan Uncovers "Fake Rape" Video Ring: August 21, 2004

"Sudanese authorities have arrested seven people in Darfur for producing fake video footage of villagers being raped by soldiers, prosecutors said. [...] Sudan has maintained that the allegations of rape were used systematically as a political tool during the nearly 18-month-old conflict in Darfur. A 19 July report by London-based watchdog Amnesty International alleges widespread rape in Darfur, but made no mention of rebel involvement or atrocities committed by them, said the official. Reports followed soon thereafter citing rebels camouflaged as Janjawid, committing atrocities against Darfurians in an attempt to discredit Sudan internationally."
[Aljazeera]

Tanner & Grady: "San Franciscan Confesses to Beheading Video Hoax": August 7, 2004

vanderford"A tech-savvy young San Francisco man who staged his own mock beheading on the Internet duped international media on Saturday into believing Islamist kidnappers had executed an American hostage in Iraq. The video, which appeared on a Web site used by Islamic militants, showed a man who identified himself as Benjamin Vanderford appealing to the United States to leave Iraq. The Web format was that used by al Qaeda ally Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and was introduced by a headline that said it showed Zarqawi killing an American. "If we don't (leave Iraq), everyone is gonna be killed in this way ... I have been offered for exchange for prisoners here in Iraq," the terrified-looking man said, rocking back and forth in his chair, his hands tied behind his back. vanderford_2The video showed a hand with a large knife apparently slicing through the neck of a limp body. But it was all a hoax. The blood was dye, the setting was a friend's garage, the Koran reading was a tape and the knife was held by a friend. Mutilated bodies and sound effects were edited in from photos on Web sites and the video was purposefully blurred to make it seem even more amateur, Vanderford said. A major motivation for his action, an unrepentant Vanderford told Reuters, was to see how the world media would react and to see if they would be fooled. "It really illustrates the potential that this kind of thing would happen," he said. [...] He said the video parody of actual beheadings of hostages in Iraq posted on Islamist Web sites was made and posted on the Web about three months ago, intended as an experiment into how quickly videos spread on the Internet. He was surprised at how long it took."
[Reuters]
[Audio interview with Vanderford: RealPlayer]


London Daily Mirror Publishes British "Atrocity Photographs": May 1, 2004

The faked photos have been subsequently been pulled from the article below in which they first appeared, but you can find the front page here.

"The shocking pictures on this page were handed to us by one of the attackers and a colleague. We have agreed to protect their identities as they fear reprisals. Last night, their damning testimony was in the hands of appalled ministers and Army chiefs who pledged an urgent investigation."
[Daily Mirror]Mirror_frontpage

Daily Mirror: "Sorry...We Were Hoaxed": May 15, 2004
"It is now clear that the photographs the Mirror published of British soldiers abusing an Iraqi prisoner were fakes. The evidence against them is not strong enough to convict in a court but that is not the burden of proof the Daily Mirror demands of itself. Our mission is to tell the truth. That is something this newspaper has been doing for more than 100 years and will always strive to do. If ever we fail, we are letting down the people who mean most to us. Our readers. So to you today we apologise for publishing pictures which we now believe were not genuine."
[Daily Mirror]

BBC offers detailed analysis of the Daily Mirror photos: May 14, 2004
"Read on for a list of key claims and, where given, the rebuttals they stood by for two weeks. Armed Forces Minister Adam Ingram told the House of Commons on Thursday : "The truck in which these pictures were taken was never in Iraq.""
[BBC]

Mirror May Never Reveal Hoax Sources: May 17, 2004
"The Daily Mirror may never reveal the sources of the fake pictures of British troops torturing Iraq prisoners because there is still a strong suspicion that the soldiers behind the hoax could be genuine whistleblowers. Des Kelly, the acting editor of the Mirror since Piers Morgan's ignominous sacking on Friday night, is determined not to succumb to pressure from the army to hand over the names..."
[Guardian]

The Boston Globe Runs Faked Photos of Rape in Iraq: May, 2004

The Boston Globe runs faked photos of rape in Iraq
"Boston residents got more than they bargained for this morning when their copy of the Globe came complete with graphic photographic images depicting U.S. troops gang-raping Iraqi women. Problem is the photos are fake. They were taken from pornographic websites and disseminated by anti-American propagandists. [...] "I'm surprised the editor even decided we should write about it [...] Somehow it got through all our checks. Our publisher's not having a very good day today.""
[WorldNet Daily]
[Scan of the Boston Globe image via Matt Drudge]

Boston Herald: Globe caught with pants down: May 13, 2004
"The Boston Globe was reeling yesterday after graphic photos of alleged sexual abuse of Iraqi women by U.S. soldiers turned out to be staged shots from a hardcore porn Web site. "This photo should not have appeared in the Globe,'' editor Martin Baron said in a statement. bostonglobesm-small"First, images portrayed in the photo were overly graphic. Second, as the story clearly pointed out, those images were never authenticated as photos of prisoner abuse. There was a lapse in judgment and procedures, and we apologize for it.'' The "lapse'' came after City Councilor Chuck Turner and perennial pot-stirrer Sadiki Kambon called a press conference in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal to display more purported abuse photos. Turner claimed they came from "a very legitimate person'' but admitted they hadn't been authenticated. Kambon said he got them from a representative of the Nation of Islam. The Globe ran a picture of Turner and Kambon displaying the images. In a large shot in the paper's early editions, pornographic details are clearly visible. In later editions, the photograph was reduced, making the images slightly more obscure."
[Boston Herald]

Globe offers editorial appology: May 14, 2004
The editorial points a finger at the source of the photos without discussing the editorial process by which the images—being offered by citizens rather than more trusted news sources—were vetted by the paper itself:
"The recent actions of Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner were reckless and inflammatory. With no regard for truth or consequences, Turner unveiled graphic photographs at a Tuesday press conference, suggesting that the images portrayed the rape of Iraqi women by US soldiers. The display was an all-time low for a member of the City Council. Turner, now in his third term, used twisted logic to justify the photo array. While stopping short of claiming authenticity, Turner argued that "the American people have a right and responsibility to see the pictures" in light of recent revelations regarding abuse of Iraqi prisoners."
[Globe Editorial and an article from the paper's ombudsman.]

Farhad Manjoo: Which Photograph of Lance Cpl. Ted Boudreaux and Two Boys in the Desert Is the Real Thing? No one Knows For Sure, In the Age of Photoshop

manjooimage"There was a time when photographs were synonymous with truth—when you could be sure that what you saw in a picture actually occurred. In today's Photoshop world, all that has changed. Pictures are endlessly pliable. Photographs (and even videos) are now merely as good as words—approximations of reality at best, subtle (or outright) distortions of truth at worst. Is that Jane Fonda next to John Kerry at an antiwar rally? No, it isn't; if you thought so, you're a fool for trusting your own eyes. Some photographers welcome the new skepticism toward images; it's good that people are learning not to automatically believe what they see, they say. But many fear that we're losing an important foothold on reality. Without trustworthy photographs, how will we ever know what in our world is real?"
[Salon — via Dan Poppy]

News & Propaganda Sites Originating in the Middle East Mix U.S. Atrocity Photos With Staged Photos Purporting To Show Rape By Occupation Forces

[Warning: Disturbing images. No active link. Although disturbing, Camera/Iraq believes we can not fully understand the War of Images without referencing at least one of these sites.] Jerusalemites.org—a pro-Palestinian propaganda site of uncertain origin—displays staged photos of Coalition soldiers raping Iraqi women. This site is representative of several anti-US/Coalition sites that exploit Abu Ghraib atrocity photos for propagandistic purposes.

Sherrie Gossett: "Bogus GI Rape Photos Used As Arab Propaganda": May 4, 2004

"Graphic photos appearing on Arabic websites of U.S. servicemen raping and sexually abusing Iraqi women were actually taken from American and Hungarian pornography sites. [...] photos of U.S. troops abusing and humiliating Iraqi prisoners but additional ones of alleged group rape of women by American soldiers, some who are depicted holding rifles against their victims' heads. The Tunisian site described the photos as the "unedited" versions of actual events and Albasrah ran the photos under the heading "The Abu Ghraib Prison Photos," indicating they had received the photos via e-mail. A WND investigation has revealed that most of the photos are taken from the American pornographic website "Iraq Babes," and the Hungarian site, "Sex in War," which is linked to by the American site."
[World Net Daily]

Faked Report of Submarine Firing Cruise Missle on Sky News: March 31, 2003

Matt Wells: "Sky Suspends Journalists Over Bogus Story": July 7, 2003
"Sky News faked a television report from a Royal Navy submarine during the Iraq war, according to a documentary team that filmed on the same vessel. [...] But the submarine was docked and the documentary crew says the events were staged for the benefit of Sky's camera. [...] But the BBC documentary alleges that the crew members were simply re-enacting their drill for the benefit of the camera. There was no target, and the pictures of the cruise missile were taken from library footage."
[Guardian]

Sky News Reporter Commits Suicide: October 6, 2003
"Former Sky News reporter James Forlong has committed suicide at his home on the East Sussex coast. Forlong, who quit his job at Sky News in July following allegations that he faked a story during the Iraq war, was found dead at his house in Hove early on Saturday morning."
[Guardian]

London "Evening Standard" Runs A Cover Photo Presumably Showing Baghdad Iraqis Cheering the Downfall of Saddam Hussein: April 9, 2003

The picture was discovered to have been substantially altered.EveningStandardCoversm-smallWhen the paper was called out on this by Indymedia.org in the UK, the Editorial Manager of the Evening Standard forwarded this denial:

"Our front-page picture of an exultant crowd in Baghdad celebrating the fall of Saddam's regime was a video grab taken from BBC News 24. As is customary practice on all newspapers, the TV station's small logos were removed and a replicated part of the background inserted. The Memory Hole website alleges that the Evening Standard intended to deceive readers by inflating the size of the crowd. Wrong. It also claims we put together two different still-frames. Wrong again. It says a man with sunglasses and white open shirt appears twice in different poses. Not true. Multiple still-frames were not used and at no time was there any intention to deceive our readers and indeed our readers were not deceived. I hope this clarifies the matter for you.
Jeannette Arnold
EDITORIAL MANAGER"

Subsequently the "Evening Standard" published this admission and rationale:

EveningStandardArticle"A number of readers have expressed concern that our front page picture on 9 April, showing Iraqis celebrating the liberation of Baghdad, had been enhanced to dipict a larger crowd than actually existed. As it was taken from TV footage, some extra people were added to the image in order to fill the space left by the removal of logos from the picture. In our opinion this did not alter the clarity of truth of the picture's message but we are happy to make this clear."

The Memory Hole offers a detailed examination of the image and the issue.

The Los Angeles Times fires photographer Brian Walski: March 31, 2003

walski-smallWalski combined two photographs taken moments apart to create a more dramatic composition, a practice in violation of the paper's policy.

Walski: "When I saw it, I probably just said, no one is going to know. I don’t know. I’ve tweaked pictures before—taken out a phone pole. It’s not a common practice, but you can do it. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I imagine they’ve done it here and there. This was going overboard—taking pictures and putting them together. I think it’s just that I wanted a better image. Then when I did it, I didn’t even think about it." [From a PDN interview no longer on the web.]
[LA Times' Editor's Note]

Thoughtful discussion of the photojournalism and Photoshopping in Pedro Meyer's: "In Defense of Patrick Schneider," an editorial in Zone|Zero.

John Kerry and Jane Fonda Linked in Fake Photo

Kerry and Fonda are Photoshopped together in fake photograph that angers Vietnam vets by portraying the pair as peaceniks. The picture, identified as from the Associated Press, is run in the Washington Post.

kerry_fonda-smallKen Light, photographer of the original Kerry picture, publishes an editorial in the Washington Post
"It's not that photographic imagery was ever unquestionable in its veracity; as long as pictures have been made from photographic film, people have known how to alter images by cropping. But what I've been trying to teach my students about how easy and professional-looking these distortions of truth have become in the age of Photoshop—and how harmful the results can be—had never hit me so personally as the day I found out somebody had pulled my Kerry picture off my agency's Web site, stuck Fonda at his side, and then used the massive, unedited reach of the Internet to distribute it all over the world."
[Washington Post Editorial]